Reblogged from LA Screenwriter:
A new article in Nature.com discusses a study that shows scientific papers that are initially rejected ultimately have a greater impact in the long run:
Just had your paper rejected? Don’t worry — that might boost its ultimate citation tally. An excavation of scientific papers' usually hidden prepublication trajectories from journal to journal has found that papers published after having first been rejected elsewhere receive significantly more citations on average than ones accepted on first submission.



